#Csj type grid how to#
#Csj type grid code#

pragmatic user over multiple occurrences or statements before arriving to a conclusion. As such, when determining the types of others, it’s important to base the assessment of that person’s interaction style as an affiliative vs. For the most part they will first transition into either their unconscious or subconscious, and as a last resort, their super ego. Cognitive transition occurs when a person is faced with a problem that they cannot solve in their ego. However, a person will be inside their ego and interact with others in either an affiliative or pragmatic way most of the time. They are potentially able to shift into a side of their mind that could be the opposite of their primary. Since everyone has four sides of the mind, everyone can utilize either an affiliative or pragmatic role depending on which side of their mind they transition to. To properly determine if someone is either affiliative or pragmatic, one must understand the difference between primary and secondary. Many times, people are confused determining the differences between affiliative vs. (in MBTI communities, F vs T is often confused with affiliative vs pragmatic, also causing mistyping amongst sensing types) Waiting to ask permission would hinder their progression. To the pragmatic, having authority over them gets in the way of achieving the fastest or most optimal outcome. For instance, if a boss is an affiliative user and has a pragmatic employee working under them who never asks for permission before making decisions, the employee runs the risk of potentially being fired because of a perceived overreach. This can be a problem-especially in the workplace. Therefore, pragmatic types will try to remain as autonomous as possible so that they are able to make their own decisions. Contrarily, the pragmatic user will see other human beings as the roadblock getting in the way of their own desired result. There is going to be an issue if all parties inside the group are not cooperating, or if they witness the unfair treatment of another person that goes against the social rules or norms. Affiliative types can be independent thinkers, but when interacting with others inside a group setting, they would expect others to communicate or check-in with everyone else before making decisions.

This doesn’t necessarily mean that all affiliative types are not independent minded or rely solely on group thinking. Pragmatic types value independence inside a group setting so that they are allowed the freedom of making their own decisions, while affiliative types value interdependence inside the group to achieve a desired result. Being affiliative means that a person’s basis for interaction is focused on what’s right.

The affiliative types are the Idealist (NFs) and the Guardians (SJs). Being pragmatic means that a person’s preferred basis for interaction is focused on what works. The pragmatic types are the Intellectuals (NTs) and the Artisans (SPs).

#Csj type grid how to#

Since the simplest way to differentiate between them is juxtaposing one from the other, I will state why mistakes are made and how to correctly differentiate between the Affiliative and Pragmatic types. This appears to be specifically a problem when differentiating between Idealists (NFs) and Intellectuals (NTs). Some parts of the law are set out in court decisions, like some additional defences and definitions of some elements of crimes that are included in the Code.It can be commonly seen throughout the typology community that there is a misunderstanding of what it means to be affiliative or pragmatic. There are other federal laws that also contain criminal law but do not form part of the Criminal Code, such as the Firearms Act, the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, and the Youth Criminal Justice Act.

#Csj type grid code#

While the Criminal Code includes most of the criminal law in Canada, it doesn’t contain all of it.

describes the powers and procedures to be followed for investigation and prosecution of an offence.establishes the kind and degree of punishment that may be imposed on someone convicted of an offence and.

sets out defences that a person can raise if they are charged.includes rules that set out how people can be guilty of crimes if they help or encourage others to commit crimes, and rules for how corporations and other organizations can be found guilty of crimes.defines the conduct that constitutes criminal offences.The Criminal Code includes a wide range of crimes, such as murder, assault, theft and fraud.